Forteau said Diaz wrote him on May 7 asking for a special convention on May 17.
“I wrote Diaz on May 9 indicating to him the time was too short of the court’s decision,” Forteau said.
The executive members contended that the May 17 meeting was not called with the requisite 28 day-notice.
Though Diaz agreed to meet with them on May 28, Forteau said Thursday’s meeting was still held.
“While you are saying you would meet with us on May 28 you are doing things to amend the constitution of the organisation. Justice Boodoosingh would have told you the caretaker committee you put in place is null and void. So Diaz is defying the court order.”
Replies
I have to give credit to FORTEAU!!! Forteau goes to his ATTORNEYS and he asks them to explain the ruling to him in a way that he could understand it and spill it out to the PUBLIC.
THE CIP, on the other hand, believe that they understand THE CONSTITUTION and THE OPINION written by THE JUDGE on their own. So they misinterpret SEVENTY PERCENT of what they read and that puts them in an embarrassing PUBLIC POSITION.
So if you want some measure on what is happening LEGALLY with this case -- READ FORTEAU and DISMISS THE CIP!!!