Free blacks in Trinidad during the late nineteenth century took to the streets
of Port of Spain painted in extravagant colors and dressed up in miraculous
costumes. Simulating the horrors of slavery in a playful manner was a provocative
symbol that the elite plantocracy and the British colonial government on the island
detested. These party participants continued this practice known as Canboulay
every year on the night before Carnival. This determination, despite intense
opposition from the ruling classes was certainly a remarkable act and symbol of
defiance.
What historians of Trinidad have neglected is to make the connection
between the importance of the Canboulay Riot of 1881 and the implications the riot
itself had on the future and evolution of Carnival as a larger celebration.1
Most
notably, the integration of the middle class into Carnival can be attributed to this
riot. Moreover, historians have yet to explain why changes in Carnival came about
through violence in Trinidad, yet occurred naturally and peacefully throughout the
rest of the Anglophone Caribbean. This essay seeks to correct this oversight by
analyzing the early years of Trinidad’s Carnival, and to present distinct differences
between Trinidad, and the other Caribbean islands that have adopted this
celebration.
You need to be a member of When Steel Talks to add comments!
Comments