It was recently disclosed by a very authoritative source that the fuel subsidy had cost the country $31 billion in the past ten years, adding that studies show the subsidies “disproportionately benefit the rich rather than the poor.”

I am wondering how much the PAN SUBSIDY has cost the country in the last 10 years.

You need to be a member of When Steel Talks to add comments!

Join When Steel Talks

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I would argue that there is no such thing as a "pan subsidy".

    The Trinidad steelband is not a welfare case, but provides an important role in Trinidad's social fabric and just as importantly in its economy.

    One cannot easily put a financial value on what a properly functioning steelband adds to a community's social and cultural environment , and especially in youth development.

    These things do have value , and cannot be quantified in terms of dollars and cents , but financial assets devoted to these programs are certainly not wasted.

    Just keeping so many of the youth occupied and off the streets should have some value , even to you ,Claude.

    Furthermore , one cannot deny the fact that steelband activity generates economic activity, especially at carnival time, and I shouldn't need to list how steelband activity stimulates the economy , to the nations benefit ; just use your imagination.

    And we're not even talking about tourism , where the concept of the "land of the steelband" has been used for generations as a cultural tourist attraction.

    These things should be obvious to anyone interested in the progress of the art-form.

    And finally , I must say that in civilized societies , art is appreciated , preserved and subsidized by wealthy patrons , foundations and governments.

    Art appreciation is one of the things that make us civilized.

This reply was deleted.