Earl Richards: I have a question for you!!!
If a MAN was the CHAIRMAN of a REGION under the old administration and during that time about $25,000 went UNACCOUNTED FOR and then under the NEW ADMINISTRATION that same man becomes the VEE PEE under the NEW EXECUTIVE which promised TRANSPARENCY and ACCOUNTABILITY and HONEST FINANCIAL DEALING: Should THAT MAN be allowed to stay on the NEW EXECUTIVE or did his misdeeds get absolved once the LAST EXECUTIVE dissolved?
Is there a STATUE OF LIMITATION on this particular crime? Does the crime dilute the INTEGRITY of the CURRENT PRESIDENT who knows about these PAST TRANSGRESSIONS but is willing to sweep it under the rug?
Should GREGORY LINDSAY be careful about what he says on this topic or should he keep battling and broadcasting for a moral resolution since THE PRESIDENT does not want to see DIAZ or the VEE PEE in HANDCUFFS?
Should THE PRESIDENT be careful about what she says on this topic or should she come right out and address and resolve the issue publicly?
Should MARK BASSANT be careful about what he says when he writes his BIG STORY in the newspapers once again destroying the PUBLIC IMAGE of PAN TRINBAGO even under a PRESIDENT who promised TRANSPARENCY and ACCOUNTABILITY?
What do you think, MR. EARL RICHARDS? You are the STAUNCHEST SUPPORTER of this WOMAN IS BOSS PRESIDENT: WHAT DO YOU THINK?