The Aubrapan: Revival of a lost invention

The Aubrapan: Revival of a lost invention
S. E. Maloney', C. A. C. Imbert2, A. G. Bryan3

1 Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CP2 1PZ, England,
Email: sem 7 3@cam.ac.uk
2Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of the West Indies,
St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago, West Indies, Email: cimbert@eng.uwi.tt
339 Lancing Road, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 3EN, United Kingdom

Abstract

The Aubrapan is a new design of the melody (or soprano) pan developed in 1978 by Guyanese pan maker and panist Aubrey Bryan in the United Kingdom. In the Aubrapan the higher frequency notes are placed nearest to the rim of the pan in contrast to the center of the pan where most high notes are generally located. The lower octaves are placed directly opposite each other in order to facilitate a pendulum-like action of the arms — these ascend in whole tones. This concept facilitates easier and rapid playing of the chromatic scale in single and double note form. In this paper we describe the development of the Aubrapan and attempt to discover why the Aubrapan has not yet found a place among the steelpan family. To answer this and other questions, the experiences of the Aubrapan's inventor will be noted and a comparison of the Aubrapan will be made with the conventional Trinidad and Tobago 4th's and 5th's soprano pan.

Introduction

The Aubrapan was created in 1978 and named after its inventor Aubrey Bryan who spent a year experimenting with various note layouts before finally choosing the layout in Figure 1. During the late 1970's to middle 1980's the Aubrapan was exhibited to several Heads of Music Departments in London schools. The pan has been played by leading panists Roy "Pele" Geddes and Godfrey Roberts and both thought highly of the invention. Frank Rollock, a former arranger of the London All Stars Steel Orchestra played the Aubrapan and was very excited about the invention, whilst a group of German panists from the Berlin Tin-Pan Alley Steel Orchestra played the instrument and had nothing but praise for it. The Aubrapan was also played by master pan-tuner Roland Harrygin and his assistants during a tour of the United Kingdom by the Casablanca Steel Orchestra. They were fascinated by this pan and praised Aubrey for his original work. Moreover, Aubrey was invited by the Crafts Council of England to exhibit his Aubrapan from June to August 1986.

The Aubrapan, in spite of receiving much accolade, was never promoted as an alternative design or a complement to the soprano family of steelpans. The only record of this instrument can be found in Bryan [1] and Grant [2]. There are two questions of interest. The first is why did the Aubrapan not find its place in the steelpan family and was the design of the Aubrapan flawed thus disqualifying it as an alternative. The first question will be answered in part by noting the experiences of the Aubrapan's inventor whilst an attempt to answer the second question will be made by comparing the Aubrapan to the traditional 4th's and 5th's Trinidad Tenor pan. However, before answering these questions a brief introduction on the steelpan is essential.

Figure 1: The Aubrapan note pattern

The Steelpan

The steelpan also known as the Caribbean steel drum or simply the pan is a tuned percussion instrument that originated in Trinidad and Tobago around the time of World War II. The music from this instrument has captivated millions worldwide such that there are steelbands all over Europe with Switzerland in 2005 accounting for at least 20 per cent of the world's steelbands [3]. The Dutch police force has a steelband [4], so does the Nigerian Army [5] and the United States Navy [6]. There are steelbands in Japan, Australia, Kuwait, South Africa and over 300 steelbands in the United States and undoubtedly, the instrument is also popular in Trinidad and Tobago and throughout the Caribbean. The instrument initially evolved from several years of experimentation with various items, which included garbage pan tops, grease barrels, biscuit pans, paint tins as well as Oxford geometry pans. During World War II, the American Naval bases and the expanding oil industry in Trinidad provided a new raw material for trial — the 55-gallon (250 Litres) oil drum. The tops of these drums were larger making it possible to accommodate more notes. Today the 250L oil drum is still commonly used to make steel pans, and over the decades the instrument further evolved into a complete ensemble of instruments (soprano pans, guitar, cello, quadraphonic and bass) with a playing range that spans approximately five octaves.

Figure 2: Ellie Manette Invader lead pan note arrangement
[7]

Steelpans are currently largely produced by traditional handcrafting which begin by stretching the drumhead to produce an evenly dished surface on which the note regions are created. The depth of the dished surface ranges from 90mm for low-pitched bass pans to 200mm for high-pitched soprano pans. Note regions are usually separated by creating a continuous line of punch marks or grooves on their perimeter. The side of the drum is cut to lengths in accordance with the steelpan type under production. Skirt lengths range from 140mm for soprano pans to the entire drum side for bass pans. After the dished surface is produced and note regions are created, the pan is heated to provide strain relief in the material prior to tuning. The final stage involves tuning of the note regions until the desired frequencies are achieved.

Since the creation of pans several variations of the melody or soprano pan have emerged. Two well-known patterns are the Invaders or Ellie Manette pan which dates back to 1948 (see Figure 2) and the Trinidad and Tobago 4th's and 5th's which is a successor of the Anthony Williams [8] spider web pan (see Figure 3). Today these pans particularly the 4th's and 5th's pattern has become a sort of de-facto standard although several other patterns continue to be used.

The Aubrapan

By 1978, the birth year of the Aubrapan, steelpans had been in England at least 27 years and there were already more than 50 school steelbands across London. These school bands were established under an educational program which

was piloted in 1969 by the Inner London Educational Authority (ILEA) [9]. There was also a London Schools Steel Orchestra. It was only natural to use the ILEA school bands as a channel for the promotion of the Aubrapan. Hence, the instrument was exhibited to the heads of several music departments in schools across London. The innovation received much accolade and recommendation but the decision to incorporate the Aubrapan into school bands did not rest with the schools. This decision was the responsibility of a music centre which was established by the ILEA in 1975. The music centre was responsible for supplying pans and selecting and training suitable tuners as tutors. The pans used in these schools were predominantly Ellie Manette pans. Hence, on the arrival of the Aubrapan, panists and instructors would have been well acquainted with the note placement on Manette pans. The notion of using a pan with a different note pattern may have seemed daunting and few might have attempted to play it. Although, the Aubrapan was widely exhibited, there is no evidence that indicates that the pan was ever introduced to school bands. Today, there are only three Aubrapans in circulation. The fact is, the music centre offered little assistance in helping to promote the Aubrapan. A discouraged Aubrey eventually shelved his invention.

Figure 3: 4th's and 5th's soprano pan note arrangement

Many argue that note placements other than those found on the 4th's and 5th's are deliberate attempts by tuners to ensure that no other bands can play their instruments. However, the Aubrapan was simply an innovation. Its creation was simply another step in the evolution of the instrument. It is important to note that the steelpan is a mere 70 years old when compared with the Stradivarius which is almost 350 years. This brings our attention to the topic of standardisation of the steelpan which has long been an issue for much debate. There is some movement to standardise [10] the following: note placement, type of steel and manufacturing processes for dishing the drum. While the quality of the drum material is important for the acoustics of the steelpan, efforts to standardise the note layout and shape of the instrument can only suffocate innovation. The process of evolution and refinement must take place before the instrument can attain any state of perfection, therefore innovation in all forms should be encouraged and rewarded.

After almost 30 years the Aubrapan has been removed from its dusty abode and revived. Figure 4 is a photograph of the first Aubrapan crafted by Aubrey Bryan. The next step is a qualitative comparison of the Aubrapan with the Trinidad and Tobago 4th's and 5th's soprano pan.

The Aubrapan vs the 4th's and 5th's Soprano pan

The Trinidad and Tobago 4th's and 5th's soprano pan is widely used and it's layout may long continue to be the de facto choice among tuners and panists. Hence, it is only appropriate to compare the Aubrapan to the 4th's and 5th's. Table 1 lists and compares some characteristics of each instrument.

Figure 4: The First Aubrapan

Table 1: Comparison of Aubrapan with Trinidad and Tobago 4th's and 5th's Soprano pan

Trinidad 4th's and 5th's Soprano pan

Aubrapan

Both pans are currently produced by traditional handcrafting

Usually has 29 notes but some makers have made soprano pans on larger platforms that can accommodate as many as 37 notes which span a 2 octave range

Currently has 32 notes

Note arrangement is based on the chromatic scale but the notes are arranged using the circle of fifths (or circle of fourths). The frequency ratio between notes in the anticlockwise direction is a perfect fifth (3:2) and the frequency ratio between adjacent notes in the clockwise direction is a perfect fourth (4:3). The notes are arranged into three rings (outer, middle and inner) with a musical range from C4 to E6. Most pans makers adopt the 4th's and 5th,s note arrangement.

Note arrangement is also based on the chromatic scale but adjacent notes have a whole tone difference in frequency. Only other notes arranged in a semi-ring with inner notes in vertical lines. Musical range from C4 to A6. The Aubrapan is one of the first pans to adopt a note arrangement in which some of the notes are arranged linearly.

Each note is surrounded by notes with which it has a musical relationship. For instance, C4 on the outer ring is surrounded by notes F4, G4 and C5. The ratios C5:C4, G4:C4 and F4:C4 i.e. (2:1), (3:2) and (4:3) in order of merit of pleasantness to the human ear. When a single note is struck, there is sympathetic vibrations in neighbouring notes that are harmonically related. This modal coupling is in part responsible for the unique sound of the pan. Dissonant notes are far apart.

Notes in the Aubrapan are not in close proximity to notes with which there is consonance. Consider the location of middle C (rectangular note) in relation to its fourth, fifth and octave. Since notes that share consonant musical relationships are not close, modal coupling may be weak.

Shallow grooving around notes

Grooving is deeper than in 4th's and 5th's pan.

Layout makes the playing of harmonic dyads easy as notes that are musically related are adjacent. The playing of chord progressions is also easily facilitated.

Layout lends itself for the easy playing of musical scales.

Most makers of 4th's and 5th's pans usually tune three modes in the outer notes, one or two in the middle notes and one in each inner note. The modes in each note are usually tuned such that they are harmonically related. For instance, the pan maker will tune each outer note to have the first three modes with natural frequencies that are in the ratio 1:2:3. So middle C will have its first three frequencies approximately at 262Hz, 524Hz and 786Hz. Some tuners claim to tune a fourth mode. Higher modes are usually non-harmonic but contribute to the overall timbre of the instrument.

At present only the fundamental mode is believed to be tuned in each note of the Aubrapan.

Conclusion

The initial shelving of the Aubrapan can be attributed to the discouragement of its inventor after several efforts to promote his instrument proved unsuccessful. The comparison of the Aubrapan with the Trinidad 4th's and 5th's highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of the Aubrapan. However, no definitive conclusions can be made on the performance of the instrument from this comparison. The answer to whether or not the Aubrapan is fit to be promoted as an addition to the steelpan ensemble requires further investigation. At this stage, a mere qualitative comparison is insufficient. The next step will consider the acoustics of the Aubrapan.

References

  • Bryan, A.G., The Aubrapan: New pan invention. 1986: 92 Auckland Rise, London SE19: unpublished
  • Grant, C., Ring of Steel - Pan Sound and Symbol. 1999: Macmillan Education Ltd.
  • Remy, J. and J.G. deBarry. Reflection on aspects that define the steelband culture of Trinidad and Tobago <URL:http://www.tobago.org/trinidad/pan/archive/r &d/uwi/RADS v04 edit2.htm> 2005 [cited 2008 16 September].
  • Imbert, C.A.C., Materials and manufacturing of The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2001. 110(5): p. 2673-2673.
  • Phillips, C. Nigeria - the land of PANLAND: an initiative of Xcel Steel Orchestra

<URL:k  x//www.panonthenet.com/articles/cparticle s/excel.htm> 2005 [cited 2008 18 September].

  • Hansen, U.J. and T.D. Rossing, Modal analysis of a Caribbean steel drum. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987. 82(S1): p. S68-S68.
  • Ellie Manette Invader (Low Lead)

URL: <http ://www.mannettesteeldrums .com/MSDpro ducts.htm>. [cited 2009 5 February].

  • Blake, I.R., The Trinidad and Tobago Steel Pan: History and Evolution. 1st ed. 1995, Port of Spain: Speeds Printery.
  • La Rose, M. and L. McCalman, eds. The Gerald Forsyth Story: The lifetime journey of a pan legend in the steelband movement. 2001, Caribbean Art and Musical Expression: London.
  • Roach, K., The Imperatives for Standardization. 1992, Trinidad and Tobago Bureau of Standards: Tunapuna, Republic of Trinidad and Tobago.

See more --- Related content

You need to be a member of When Steel Talks to add comments!

Join When Steel Talks

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I would like to hear what the AUBRAPAN sounds like!!!

    ANYBODY???

  • Dear Aubrypan revivalist, while we encourage innovation and development on steel pans, we need not go further to develop the note placements on the treble pan. Antonio Williams of Trinidad and Tobago’s cycle of fifth is the standardized treble pan. The Antonio Williams cycle of fifth treble pan meets all the musical, scientific and artistic requirements. Musically, for example, the cycle of fifth pan has a perfect form that runs clockwise and anti-clockwise. Scientifically, every two notes progressively that go anti-clockwise have a 3:2 Pythagorean interval. In simple terms, each note going anti-clockwise progressively is separated by a perfect fifth.
    Artistically, the spread of the chromatic scale on the cycle of fifth treble pan accomplished the right hand and left-hand sequences.

    The bottom line is that according to the science of music and physics, the Antonio Williams cycle of fifth treble pan is consistent with the Pythagorean temperament.

    On the other hand, the Aubrypan failed to establish a perfect form clockwise and anti-clockwise. Also, the Aubrypan does not maintain a constant ratio in the progressive note placements. Further, on the Aubrypan, the chromatic spread is interrupted after the E flat going clockwise and after the D note going anti clockwise. The defects in the Aubrypan disqualify it from consideration.

    The good news is that the Antonio Williams cycle of fifth treble pan meets all the required specifications. It is for these reasons that Antonio Williams cycle of fifth is the standardized treble pan.

This reply was deleted.