The following is a look at the numbers, as they relate to discussions on WST (When Steel Talks):
- Number of views of WST Interviews: Salmon Cupid 158, Brian Copeland 156, George D. Goddard 199.
- Percentage of WST members who openly opposed the use of electronic instruments in Panorama: 75
- Percentage of WST members who believe the E-Pan has no place anywhere in pan: 0
- Percentage of posts by Salmon Cupid, in which he inserts his marketing of the E-Pan: 99.99
- Number of pan players who called him out on his exploitative endorsement efforts: 2
- Number of testimonials from satisfied E-Pan buyers: 0
- Number of video clips showing the E-Pan’s studio applications: 0
- Number of video clips showing how an E-Pan player can effectively replace a pianist/keyboardist: 0
- Number of E-Pan endorsements free of “conflict of interest” to date: 0
- Number of steel drum/pan virtuosos who purchased an E-Pan: 0
- Percentage of E-Pan “raving fans” who have openly expressed disgust with the instrument, and who have sentenced the instrument to extinction: 75
- Number of E-Pan “raving fans” who expose their disdain for either black skin, poverty, the needy, and/or the traditionally Afro-Trinbagonian PNM party: 100 (This includes the “inventor”.)
Numbers DO NOT Lie!
Ghost Who Knows The Numbers Speak For Themselves
Replies
QUESTIONS: Could anyone answer the question as to why neither Othello Molineaux, Robert Greenidge, nor Andy Narell have either endorsed or purchased and E-Pan or P.H.I.? Why aren't the owners of these electronic devices seeking out the endorsements of those in the upper echelon? What can one gather from the answers to those questions?
Ghost Who Expects Silly Answers From The "Raving Fans"/Braying Jackasses. lol. (Is it okay to use that word here? Or should I say "stubborn mules" instead?)