Pan gone backwards to go forward.

12393751279?profile=originalThe steel pan still fascinates me as an industrial musical instrument that has the potential to be as commonplace as the electric guitar or portable electronic keyboard. Portability, short learning curve relative to traditional music learning experience, and ease of manufacture seem to be the factors that make the two aforementioend so popular. Some recent innovations by local entrepreneurs are intersting: The P.H.I.® by UWI-based engineers and the e-Pan™ by Toronto-based Salmon Cupid. Both are controllers for synthesizers as opposed to organic instruments, but innovation like this should be encouraged as the music instrument manufacturing industry in the US alone was worth at least US$2 billion in total domestic demand. Globally, the numbers can rival our budget, and the sky's the limit. Smarter persons than I would be needed to advise and move the process of exploitation further along.

12393751683?profile=originalSome other innovations of the pan harken back to the original instrument, then a small instrument moulded out of a kerosene drum with a playing surface on a convex shape, and played with the hands. According to the chronnology, the rudimentary pan was played with the hands then the raw stick then padded stick. The European innovaters Felix Rohner and Sabina Schärer (PANArt Hangbau AG), started a "re-evolution", to coin a 3CANAL phrase, back to the future. Their instrument, the Hang was followed by The Halo, as well as the Hank, and its derivatives, the HAPI drum, the TurtlePan and the Zen Tambour. All are American innovations. There exists a community of "handpan" players, enthusiasts and innovators.

What has struck me about these new organic instruments is the size. Compact and portable are two features that seem to factor into the popularity of musical instruments. The size of violin versus a double bass may tell of its popularity as an instrument of learning and practice for a number of students outside the music school or auditorium space. So too, the trumpet, saxophone and many reed and horn instruments. I looked at pannist Mikhail Salcedo playing a G-pan family member instrument at Ibiza once, and was struck by its larger size relative to the conventional tenor pan that he normally plays; 26.5 inches for the G-pan compared with 23 inches in the conventional pan. Granted there was a wider range of pitches in the instruments even if there were some pitch problems on the lower notes. That evolution in pan does not seem to be moving in the direction of recent innovations in musical instrument design.

What's the phrase: "It's not the size of the instrument, but how you use it." Electronics manufacturers are churning out tablets and smart phones with 4 - 7 inch screens to view streaming movies on the go. In the right environment and space, one can view a movie on 65 inch LED screens in 3D. The same can be said of the G-pan family, as an orchestral instruments it may be apt, but the new innovations in design point to these compact "handpans", all of which are being created overseas. There is as yet no mass movement towards this class of instruments, but as the home of the steelpan, our vision should be on a horizon where anyone and everyone can buy and play a pan because it's easy to play, easy to handle, relatively inexpensive and readily available online and elsewhere.

 

####

 

Further Notes by Nigel Campbell on Facebook

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of When Steel Talks to add comments!

Join When Steel Talks

Comments

  • I was searching the net recently for innovations like this but unfortunately I didn't get much info. Maybe it's because of my poor searching skills lol. But yeah very interesting article.  It would be interesting if these e pans become more widely available to see how ppl would use them. I don't think that we should be replacing the traditional instrument but embracing this as an alternative.  I mean when you compare the acoustic guitar and the electric, they sound different and are used differently in different types of music 
  • Interesting article.
  • @Wayne, the laws of physics also say you can electrify the instrument and create a new instrument, much like Les Paul and others did with the guitar. All that wa left was for Leo Fender to innovate design and manufacturing techniques, and the electric guitar became the anchor for the blues and rock 'n' roll revolution that transformed music globally in the decades after. And here we are talking about sound. By hte way, the Yamaha Avant Grande replicates the sound of a 9 ft grand piano perfectly within the limits of human hearing. Think outside the box!
  • http://www.facebook.com/notes/nigel-campbell/pan-gone-backwards-to-...

     

    http://www.panonthenet.com/news/2010/mar/epancupid-3-21-10.html

     

    the E-Pan carries carries thirteen (13) octaves.

    http://napeinc.com/product.htm

     

    The user also will have the capability of changing from octave to octave, both manually, by the control panel or by the use of a foot pedal.

    https://www.youtube.com/user/electronicsteelpan#p/u/5/xWPfyekEago

     

    See Duvone demonstrate the use of the sustain pedal and extension of octaves...

     

    Look like the gimmicky-tricks moving this backward/forward.

     

     

  • The laws of physics dictate that the size of the conventional pan cannot be made smaller without sacrificing the number of notes and their values etched onto it. That is why the gpan is bigger, because it containes more notes. The physical size of the notes is fixed by the material of the pan (and its thickness) so that a smaller pan would have to contain less notes.
    The epan and PHI are electroic synthesizers (Rolad electronics) using a percussive input. The only resemblance to a traditional pan is the placement of the notes enabling a pannist to 'play' different instrument sounds without learning to play a different instrument. Its appeal and use is probably more suited to the 'one man band' type of musician playing club circuits etc.
    It has no relation to the acoustic instrument, the timbre of which is derived from the physical tuning of the notes which cannot be easily be duplicated by an electronic circuit.
    The original pan remains unchallenged for its unique sound.
    The bass drums would be the most likely to benefit from replacement by an electronic instrument because of their physical size and less complex harmonic makeup of the notes but the sound of the tenors for example remain the domain of the traditional steelpan.
This reply was deleted.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives